Change in table format?[]
I noticed the table format for the locations have changed for this page. I personally liked the previous way (Location, Description, Edition), but that's not really important; it's more important to see if which standard do we want to follow. Some of the other magazines are already following the Loc-Des-Edi, so it'd be a bit of work to change those to fit Edi-Loc-Des for all those pages. I just want to make sure if that's what others want going forward for the other mags, since some just have Loc-Des.
Also, should we merge the Effects and Location table, like in Live & Love? I've been making it so that magazines that have multiple effects for different issues would also have an Effect column.
- I believe that there needs to be two types of tables. One for those magazines that only increase a level of a perk, and the other for those magazines that give unique bonuses. The latter would have to be split for the Locations and Characteristics sections. Thoughts?
- PS. please sign your posts.
--Ant2242 (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I prefer having everything being within a single table, so that users don't have to search through two tables to find the issue and location for the magazine they want. Especially since we are using images as the issues in one table, but text as issues in the other. --Xtkbilly (talk) 23:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)