Talk:Scrappers

Whoa. Why does it fail? Until Point Lookout comes out and the initial reports are confirmed or denied, this could be a variant of Hillfolk. And don't tell me that variants of enemies don't need seperate articles. Nitpicker of the Wastes 20:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I removed the tag Nitty. When I found it, it was so shittily put togrther, I tagged it. Then it got fixed so I removed it. Fat Man Spoon 20:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I know that. But now it's a redirect. Right back to Hillfolk. Nitpicker of the Wastes 20:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I changed it so it wasn't a redirect. Fat Man Spoon 20:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I seem to be getting finicky, huh? Nitpicker of the Wastes 20:56, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Let's just leave them all on the Hillfolk page for now, once the DLC is out we can still decide whether the variants need separate articles. -- Porter21 (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. Fat Man Spoon 21:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright. What did we do with Broken Steel's creatures? Nitpicker of the Wastes 21:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Broken Steel's have separate pages. It's a from case to case thing, e.g. all variants of Trogs are on the same page. -- Porter21 (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. So for this, separate pages? They do look extremly distinctive. Fat Man Spoon 21:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, as I said we'll see about that after release. -- Porter21 (talk) 21:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)