Talk:History of Lyons' Brotherhood of Steel

Events Pages
Should the events pages themselves be connected to this page? Maybe as see main page or something.--Ant2242 03:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That is a very good idea. Also, u liek? ;)Tagaziel 13:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes very much. I think it might be a good idea to create a history page for spacific BoS chapters if there is enough info.--Ant2242 16:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Why did you remove the bits about The Expedition and contacting the Midwest BoS? Also I seen to vaguely recall something about them "falling on hard times" somewhere inside the Citadel.--Ant2242 16:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * P.S. should the be removed from the title?--Ant2242 16:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I think so, so I'll do that. Brilliant work Tagz! -- GOTW '''User 20:08, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I am also concerned about removing the other tasks of the expedition. Also, from artice: Brotherhood of Steel expedition to DC merged suggestion shoudn't be now deleted? --Languorous_Maiar 12:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * These have been removed, as there is no actual evidence to back them up. There is not a single line of dialogue (and I've checked pretty much every single conversation both between the player and the NPCs and between the NPCs themselves) that might imply that Lyons' detachment had any other mission than scouring the east coast for technology, much less any nonsensical reports about supermutant activity or brining the Midwest back under Lost Hills authority. The former is only referenced in the pre-release Emil Pagaliuro's blog, which contradicts what's actually stated in the game (particularly the severity of the supermutant threat), while the latter is not mentioned at all. Rothchild only refers to the Chicago chapter in a single line of dialogue: that it's gone rogue and that it's a long story. That it. As a self-professed Fallout scholar, I decided to rely on reliable sources from the actual game, rather than a very unreliable pre-release blog that is extremely biased in its portrayal of Lyons and his Brotherhood . I'm not even going to mention the abysmal quality of writing. Tagaziel 13:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Should the contradictory info be added? Also why not add that sine line you mentioned? Is it not a reference, no matter how vague it was?--Ant2242 15:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The contradictory info is limited to a single pre-release blog, so it can be added in a behind the scenes or notes section at the end. Since it's largely contradictory, it doesn't belong in the text proper. For the latter, it's just a single line that doesn't really mean anything: there's nothing in it to imply that Lyons' expedition ever had any order to contact them, or even that any direct contact was made. I'm not even sure where did the original statements come from. Tagaziel 16:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Grammer question.
Should it be "Lyons'" or "Lyons's"?--Ant2242 (talk) 12:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a matter of style, both are correct for singular possessive forms as far as I know. Personally, I like Lyons' more, as it has a cleaner look. Tagaziel (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)