User talk:ZERO N7

If you want to, we can simply rename the existing account for you. Ausir(talk) 21:39, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Listen
Alright, listen, I'll start off saying I didn't want to ban her. She had potential, and I can understand the "That time of the month" deal and shit. But here's where I draw the line. The assumption that she's the only one who's stressed out is down right untrue. I'm managing two sites, maintaining a household, holding good grades at school, working a company, writing about five novels, AND I find time to work on the wiki. This isn't a matter of stress, it is a matter of devotion, and she wasn't devoted. Being swamped doesn't mean you don't have literally five minutes everyday, which was what we were wondering. She wasn't the only one in question. It was a general vote on what to do. In the time she spent arguing with us she could have edited at least five pages and proved us flat wrong. That would have said more than her argument. On top of this, she attacked (and yes, you classified me under the realm of attacking, and I will go onto this) a devoted member, Ramallah, for him simply speaking his mind on the matter, as we wanted him to as it was a discussion and vote. She than degraded us by saying we had our goals to high and that we didn't spend enough time editing, when she had less than half of the edits of any of our other members. I did attack her, yes, but know this: I lead the wiki. If I'm not strong and if I don't act, it will dissolute into nothingness. It has happened before, we were pressured and I did nothing and we were essentially shut down for weeks. I have to be tough in order to maintain order. If I have to mount heads on pikes, so be it. But, I am willing to lift the ban and allow her back (if she so desires) easily if she formally apologizes to me and Ramallah via the Vault. I will delete my harmful comments if this is done, and we will all go back to normal (she will still not be an admin, as we now have stricter policies revolving that area). But I thank you for the explanation, that eases my mind and I give my sympathy for the fallen friend. I understand pain and suffering. I just believe her way of dealing with it was the wrong way. I would love to talk this out, but I do not wish to approach her lest bring more harm to the situation. Thank you, sincerely Sombar1 05:56, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

I just messaged her. I feel really bad about all that has happened. Things got out of hand and I just felt like I needed to step in. She was taking the offensive against Ramallah and so I tried to talk her out of it but she ignored my request so I took a drastic measure. It was stupid, and everyone would like to get past it. I messaged her and I hope to get past this because of the size of our ambitions and the need of a strong and devoted community. I will lift the ban and I will revoke harmful statements from the front page. Thank you. Sombar1 06:08, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, rules are rules. Stability should be kept. Grammarlad decided on the regulations for admins and we are currently re evaluating admins. She can easily become one again by contributing more. I'd love to get her back in the driver's seat but we are still facing troubles on how to ensure that those who are admins, especially High Admins, can prove themselves. Should she work on some projects, add a few articles, and edit a few pages she'll up her respect and her position in no time. But how would it look after all this if I put a user who I blocked back into the position of High Admin? I'd love her to be there, but sadly I cannot. However, there are certain non-admin positions I am appointing for those who are yet to achieve the position, and I would gladly give her one of those. They take strength and dedication, and I'm sure she can handle them. Sombar1 06:18, May 29, 2011 (UTC)