Forum:What do we want from FO4

More custom weapons more random encounters more people fighting for there lives out in the wastes i mean come on why are the only people i see random encounters or scavers (like im talking some small army fighting tooth and nail with super mutants *(junk yard style cars???) more fun, longer storyline and some fan input would be great! more settlements.

Now its your turn--Meca-dope 18:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * what do you think about cars like that junky car from half life 2 remember that thing? That joyful sound.

i have a high hope for fallout 4 as a die hard f3 fan. it would be nice if all of the guns from the originals got into the games as well as a return to the west coast. the game is lacking dialogue though as well as traders, settlements and the ability to arm the major groups such as the brotherhood and outcasts you can give casadin stuff but it isn't given to any of the other members. more options with the house and a steady stream of enemy's would be a glorious tribute to athos. and less bugs and glitches.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 19:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I feel that more life needs to be pumped into the game, particularly the settlements. Places like Arefu and Canterbury Commons claim to be towns, but they have 5 people in them and a caravaner. If the same amount of settlements existed with at least 12 named npc's, then the game would be better. I would also like a bit more back story. Tenpenny tower is not explained in any way, nor is paradise falls, arefu or canterbury commons. --I-am-a-panda 19:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

the panda has a point, the only real cities are paradise falls, rivet city, megaton, underworld, and tenpenny tower. plus there isnt any back story really to any of the cities there just places to go and do very little trading.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 20:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

well not true all the city's have a story but yeah there could be more city's but remember all the city's in the other games where from ex vault dwellers almost all of the capital wasteland vaults failed

i just hope fallout 4 uses the van buren story to a degree as well as a the original fallout stories.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 20:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Sigh so much for peace and civility--Meca-dope 22:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

all those that like f3 unite. no really maybe they'll start getting people that are enthusiastic about the game.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 22:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand all these fo2 fo1 fanboys i love fo3 i hate turn basted gaming and why do we need to fight and on top of that why in the hell are the fo3 haters in the fo3 folder?--Meca-dope 22:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

your speaking my language friend i cant stand the originals except as places to start future games, and i dont think this guy is right in the head he doesn't seem to realize that being a jerk isn't cool.(cant say anything worse wish i could this guy!)PS turned base had its time now its all about fps games.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 22:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)PPS i don't think this guy can do anything doesn't look like hes a admin or moderator just some guy.

I really like them all. Shockingly, the originals are more violent than the new one. Broeman 12:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

cant wait for f4 by bethesda its theirs forever!HAHAHAHA. they better make it good!Maccy Man the man with no plan. 23:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Small scale Multiyplayer, 2-5 users per room, co-op. Not a great idea but i would like it. also. hard bosses. and more weapons, better visuals, better modding tools, more armour, uhh. Everything that comes with the next game. --NeoScott 11:02, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

For multiplayer, you would have to be unable to use VATS, because it would be really annoying to everyone else if every time you tried to target something, the game stopped. For that to work, they need to tune up the fps elements. I'd like to see different recticles for every gun, personally. Broeman 12:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Several more custom built weapons would be nice. The current selection is pitiful. More bosses or mini-bosses. The followers AI could also use improvement. Nearly every settlement is seriously underequipped to defend themselves. How many times has an entire town been wiped out by a random encounter? Some multiplayer options are always interesting at the very least. --Dreaming Chimera 14:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

the degree at which fallout 1 and 2 fans hold them selves and their hhorrible game astounds me.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 19:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Dude, they are great games. They were both awarded PC game of the year, and thousands of people still play them, over a decade since they came out. Now I'm sure you've never even played them, and have no idea what you're talking about. Broeman 12:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

hope they remake fallout 1 & 2 into fps games.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 06:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

1) Multiplayer Online. 2) true open-endedness, with the ability to purchase buildings, set up businesses, develop factions and alliances, and settlements etc. 3) A DL GECK for the 360 and PS3.

I like the FPS aspect and graphics but think the RPG element could be opened up a bit.

Nix510 19:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

your a gods send, i cant believe all the people that keep saying f3 is crap, its not. and i agree with what your saying they did do some things that arent kosher with me but still i love the game in a special way!Maccy Man the man with no plan. 19:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I have started to hope that Bethesda abandons the Fallout series. So many children complaining...it would serve them right to see the series die out totally. Bethesda could put all of their focus into giving us a fantastic Elder Scrolls game, and since no one wanted the Fallout series anymore before Bethesda picked it out of its grave, you can bet they still won't touch it....unless they decide to make another game like Fallout 3. i guess they kinda have to follow up on its success since it has gotten GOTY from almost everyone. There will always be haters... Gsmikem 21:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

how can you say that beth needs to make more fallout games and make them the best games ever.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 23:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

The only thing I really miss in F3 is the ability to join different factions, which would alter the quests and story. For example, you could choose to join the BoS, and you would do some quests for them and ultimatly save the wasteland for their account. OR, you could join the Enclave and do their quests, and have to face the BoS as enemies. Something like that, hope you get what I mean. KillerIsMe

what about the little people.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 19:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, I think that the bigger factions would also effect the smaller factions. For example, joining the BoS wouldn't be very popular among the Outcasts, but they wouldn't mind you if you were a Slaver, Regulator or possibly even a Raider or Talon Merc. Though, if you were a Raider or Talon Merc, good cities (like Megaton or Rivet City would have been if this was in F3) would not welcome you. KillerIsMe

wish that you could join more agencies cant stand being all alone in the wastes. maybe assaults on enemy camps like Bannister not just the Jefferson memorial. i would suggest making the Washington monument a battle to the top fighting mutants that took over the monument, with the help of the brotherhood. or be able to attack old olney and make it a brotherhood or outcast base becuase its fairly close to the crash site.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 01:17, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Dude, the monument is barely wide enough to fit 2 people in there. Broeman 12:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

im talking about on the way up using the stairs.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 19:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess. Anyway, FO4 isn't going to be in DC anyway, so it doesn't really matter. As for me, I'd like to see an NYC setting, especially since I live there lol. Also, your decisions having way more impact. In FO3, there is such a rigid storyline. Sure, you can execute the missions however you like, but most of them end the same way no matter what you do [a notable exception being Power of the Atom, the only mission where your decision has a huge, permanent affect on the game.]. I want to see missions play out like the originals, where there are several missions where the fate of whole settlements based on your decision. In those, you really felt like you were making an impact. Broeman 02:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

i was talking about for a dlc. but city wise id like to see it in Denver, Seattle, Chicago, Miami, or riverside ca my home town.though nyc might be cool it would be big, wonder if central park would have a city in it.Maccy Man the man with no plan. 02:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, there probably would, seeing as it has water, shelter, and probably some mutated squirrels for shelter. Also, there could be a Vault under the UN, to keep all the representatives safe. Moar Grox... also put us back on the west coast where the Brotherhood got the vertibird plans and are deploying them in air battles with the enclave remmnants and you should be able to fly 1 or use the miniguns on the side and make enclave smoothies

Maybe I'd like to go back to the West Coast in an FPS version, but I think we need to see the fate of more parts of the country. Also, new factions. You can't reuse the BOS and enclave in every game. Broeman 11:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, the Enclave is nation-wide. The President of the US is Enclave, right? (Haven't finished the game yet...waiting for 3rd DLC to come out) And the BOS was around nation-wide before the war started, so they are everywhere, too. Gsmikem 16:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, the Brotherhood didn't exist before the war, it was formed in the years following the nuclear holocaust by Mariposa's military crew. That Furry Bastard 20:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

You are correct. After a bit of research, I found that they were founded in Southern California and sent a group of BoS to DC to scour the area for technology, and to find out more about the Super Mutant problem. Gsmikem 20:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

I hope they dont set it on the westcoast AGAIN, the west coast has had three major games for it (1,2,And NV which everyone seems to not mention?) While the east coast still has so many places to go and so many stories to tell , all everyone wants to do is go back and do whats already been done .. stick to the East coast, Add loads more weapons and armor , Mention the events of fallout 3 for once !! , Longer story, and i would like to see a sprint function that used up AP because i dont use V.A.T.S too much .. :( But most of all, i just hope they dont set the game on the west coast YET AGAIN

I would like to see the weapons and armors/outifts from all existing Fallout games in FO4. More custom built weapons to(without specific perks to make them) What I don't want to see is any multiplayer or co-op modes. You want multiplayer and co-op modes, go play CoD. The Fallout games are single player experiences, and any multiplayer or co-op features would absolutely ruin that experience. I liked the idea if Weapon Repair Kits(those should be included in FO4 as well), but I'd like to see some Armor Repair Kits. The one big change I'd like to see is Unique weapons not be in the hands of non-hostile NPCs. If the NPCs are hostile, that's fine, but give standard weapons to non-hostile NPCs.--Ryker6105:21, September 30, 2011 (UTC)~10:20pm 9/29/2011

Mirelurks and Mirelurk kings and the proper robot voices back Fallout: Shades of Grey, coming 2012 01:29, October 1, 2011 (UTC)