User talk:Arisian

Sugar bombs
Beacuse you deleted some the set places and replaced it with ones that only appear by doing something, or though theft which we don't include. - RASICTalk 23:38, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actual moderator steps in to save the day! I've returned the locations, they were good. Nitty Tok. 00:10, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Schematics
When you collect the third schematic, you actually build a better version of the weapon if it's not an explosive. The resulting Dart Gun or Rock-it Launcher has 25% more item HP, which means it can fire more times before breaking. Nitty Tok. 03:11, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * This is actually blatantly wrong, just from what I knew at the time. :/

Re: Ranger Compound Edits
One of The Vault's editing standards is to not include strategy in articles. That includes detailed how-to's and instructions. It is enough to say the area is reachable by stacking items and jumping. Further discussion of particular methods can be discussed in the forums. Cheers.--Gothemasticator 14:14, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * He's right; we don't usually do how-to things for articles. Mentioning that there is stuff up there and that you can stack crap to get to it is all we'd really use. Your in-depth strategy could go on the talk page of the article, though. Nitty Tok. 00:26, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks like you got it sorted out with Nitty. Thanks for your civil approach. See you around the wiki.--Gothemasticator 01:43, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * But it's good that you did edit it, so that someone noticed that it was out of place, and rectified the situation. It may not be the outcome you wanted, but it was good for the wiki since it resolved a problem.
 * As far as I'm concerned, people are quite capable of figuring out that they can stack 5mm rounds to get to otherwise out-of-reach places.-- 01:45, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * What happened is your edit threw the page onto the recent edits page which I patrol. I don't look at location pages very often at all, mostly the NPC pages are my stomping grounds. As to your point about many pages containing strategy - that's true. But it's also true that as those pages get tackled the strategy gets removed. We have close to 10,000 pages and, what?, a dozen active administrators and maybe 2 dozen veteran editors who have a general knowledge of what belongs and what doesn't. So, articles in active projects get patrolled, new pages get patrolled, and recent changes gets patrolled. Articles that slip between those cracks get ignored for sometimes quite a while. But, all in all, we get to them as we can. Cheers.--Gothemasticator 01:54, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I reviewed your recent edit and made a slight modification. It should meet with approval from the other admins. -- 02:15, September 18, 2010 (UTC)