The Vault talk:Van Buren article project

This is good. The influx of Van Buren articles, no offense to Tezzla, are really lacking in the information that is readily available. Nitty Tok. 21:24, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

All that we need to do now is just get more members. Maybe we could advertise the project in some way... (Not in a spammy way of course).Tezzla Cannon 09:57, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

People aren't really interested in making articles about a game that never came to be playable to the max.You should have a good advertisement otherwise i don't see people participating

Felixwilliams12 10:07, April 8, 2010 (UTC)felixwilliams12
 * Source? This game wasn't released, but it is much more interesting than other, released games in the series. (See FOBOS.) Also, "advertisement"? Why do we need advertisements on something that most people will not be able to comprehend? Nitty Tok. 02:50, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Well we need to advertise the project to people who will be able to comprehend so that we can get more members. Right now we've only got 3 participants. With only three people, this project will probably take a very long time. Tezzla Cannon 12:44, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Model article
Which article are we going to use as the standard?

Might I suggest Coleridge? It's got the new page layout, and has all of the information from the BOMB design doc. Nitty Tok. 02:50, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Software, Resources, etc
Where/how can I get my hands on what I would need to help out? Thanks. -- The Arcadian Rook(talk)User blog: Arcadian Rook 19:22, August 18, 2011 (UTC)