Forum:Will New Vegas be considered cannon?

I'm just wondering, because Bethesda has confirmed plans to keep making more Fallout games in the series. Does anyone know how these stories will affect each other? I know Bethesda is only publishing the game, and not actually making it in their studios. --Esscex 20:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it will be canon. Especially that it's being made by some of the makers of Fallout and Fallout 2. Ausir 20:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't think it will be.But hey,that's just me. HuangLee 20:21, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Tactics and Brotherhood of Steel weren't considered canon, right? I really don't know, but if they weren't, then this has a considerable chance of being non-canon.--71.126.46.139 00:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Tactics and BoS weren't developed by the original Fallout team. Read the articles related to the games, and you'll see. As New Vegas IS developed by the original team, I think it is a safe bet that it will be canon, at least canon enough to please those who thought Fallout 3 wasn't canon enough. AngryNorwegianDude 20:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thats just made me think of something, what if F:NV is better than F3 in that it has way more weapons and enemies and perks and factions and sidequests and bigger map and so on, woulden't everyone go over to F:NV and scrap F3? 81.234.140.17 07:27, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Anyone who thinks FO:NV has the slightest chance of not being canonical is an idiot. That Furry Bastard 08:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

You furry bastard... HuangLee 02:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)