User talk:Ausir/Archive 7

Picture Backgrounds
Thanks for helping clear up the image background problem, they were starting to get on my nerves. Mr Zurkon 14:16, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

VB design documents
Seems like I've found a way to make a semi-decent conversion of the VB design documents to MediaWiki syntax :) I've converted and uploaded them all (see The Vault:Document conversion project). They need some patching up; hopefully a lot of the patching up can be done by bot or with a regex text editor. Figure it's worth starting a little project? I'm not all that keen on doing it all on my own, the Ultimate Fallout Guides were enough for me in that regard :P -- Porter21 (talk) 12:31, January 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, ok - I only quickly glanced at the additional Bloomfield files and it seemed like a lot of technical stuff with little lore relevance. I'll convert these later; I'm currently extracting (and properly naming) all the images from the documents so I can upload them. Nearly done with that, only Reservation, Bloomfield and BOMB-001 left :)


 * I'll start the project later (or you can do it in the meantime if you want). -- Porter21 (talk) 22:14, January 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * I think before we start splitting them up and moving them to article space, we should see whether there are any conversion issues we need to fix first. That's easier to do as long as they are still in one piece. There are a couple of issues with the various tables (table headers for some, cell arrangement for others) and with the lists in the quest/NPC sections. I think these can be patched up by bot, but it's easier to do as long as the documents are still "all-in-one" because I have to work on less pages and issues are likely to exist across a whole given source document (like the problem with internal links 2-3 of them have). I'd suggest we do the other work first (on the subpages of the project page) and then move them over to article space when we get to splitting them.


 * As for how to split them up, what you did is similar to what I had in mind. Most of the documents have a similar structure (Tibbets is a bit of an exception though), so in general I think we can split them into "intro", "locations", "NPCs/creatures", "quests" and "addendum" (or whatever the last one should be called). Originally I was planning to have the "intro" section directly in the main article (e.g. Tibbets Prison design document) but I think your idea of putting a TOC for the whole document there instead is better :)


 * Anyway, I'm heading to bed now, I'm rather tired :P Renaming 300 images was not the most exciting task. -- Porter21 (talk) 02:52, January 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've fixed a couple of conversion issues in all documents, mostly with tables and whitespace. I've made the changes for Tibbets on the project subpage (The Vault:Document conversion project/01 Tibbets Prison) since I didn't know what you already changed in the bits you copied over and didn't want to overwrite them; I'll leave merging the two versions up to you :) I still need to fix the Word link issue with a couple of Puuk's design docs, but the others can be split up/moved to article space now as far as I'm concerned. -- Porter21 (talk) 15:03, January 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Merged the two versions. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:05, January 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * What do you think about this concept I've been working on? I think it'd be good if each part of a design doc had a full TOC for the whole document so they're easier to navigate, and since the documents will be fairly static (with no changes to headers etc) once fully converted we should be fine with a manually created TOC.


 * Basically we can use Document TOC to create a manual TOC for a design doc (e.g. etc) and then simply transclude it in every part article. Only the TOC for the current page is uncollapsed, the TOCs for the other parts are automatically collapsed. On the document main page, all parts are uncollapsed (this functionality still needs to be added). -- Porter21 (talk) 20:33, January 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Need a little input regarding splitting the Nursery design document. Due to its size, I originally planned to split it into 3 parts. Unfortunately, the "Locations" section in that document is very extensive; it's more than two thirds of the whole doc (48kb out of 70kb total). Should I split in the middle of that section, or should I rather leave it in one piece? I'm currently undecided. -- Porter21 (talk) 21:17, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Well, the problem is that the "Locations" section itself is roughly about 40-45kb. If I leave it in one piece, it doesn't make much sense to split the rest into even more pieces - i.e. if we leave the locations in one, I'd only make 2 pieces and the first part will be fairly large (which can't be helped because of the "Locations" section's size).

The setup of the document is basically ~4 pages of intro, 23 pages "Locations", 16 pages "Art Requirements" etc. It's due to Deiley stashing a lot of stuff in the location description which should really be elsewhere (quest info, scripting info) :P -- Porter21 (talk) 21:28, January 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'd agree. I don't like splitting sections either (which is why I asked in the first place). -- Porter21 (talk) 21:39, January 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * To what name should I move the Bloomfield dialogue files - "Kyle the Hook dialogue file" (for example) or "Bloomfield design document/Kyle the Hook dialogue"? The first is shorter and corresponds to the naming of other VB "dialogue files" (which are just copy-pasted bits and pieces from that one VB text dump), the second makes it clearer they belong to the Bloomfield docs. -- Porter21 (talk) 14:42, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Aside from the above, what's your opinion about splitting these? I feel it'd be counterproductive since you have to do some reading back and forth if you want to understand the dialogue tree. On the other hand, at least Sid's dialogue draft is fairly lengthy at 125kb page size. I'm leaning towards leaving them in one piece, but I'd like to hear your opinion as well. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:53, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll leave them as they are then. On a sidenote, only the BOMB-001 doc is left now :) -- Porter21 (talk) 21:17, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fallout 3 player housing cleanup
I notice you put a cleanup tag on this article page. I wonder if it is because of the layout/format or because of the opinionated content or what. For instance, if I replace the content with something formatted like below, would that fit the bill? Or are you hoping to preserve the pro/con format but with layout improvements and a culling of unhelpful text?--Gothemasticator 07:04, January 20, 2010 (UTC)

= =Ownable housing== Both of these locations include secure storage, an owned bed, as well as purchasable themes and ameninities.
 * My Megaton House
 * Tenpenny Tower Suite

= =Hotels and rentable housing== For a fee, these locations provide secure storage and an owned bed.
 * Moriarty's Saloon
 * Weatherly Hotel
 * Carol's Place

= =Non-ownable housing== These are locations that contain at least one secure storage container and a bed.
 * Location 1
 * Location 2
 * Etc.

VB featured articles
I'm almost done with the featured article rotation for the VB portal. All I still need is one last article, preferably a faction one. Got any ideas? I was thinking of either the Ciphers or the Hands of God, since both Jericho and Mesa Verde have no related featured articles so far. Both of these articles would need to be written first though. -- Porter21 (talk) 16:10, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, went with Ciphers. -- Porter21 (talk) 17:53, January 20, 2010 (UTC)

Jericho vs. New Canaan
Well, I really haven't read enough of these documents to make a qualified judgement. While you already mentioned the arguments for giving the New Canaan document preference over the Jericho one, there are also an argument for giving the Jericho document priority: If Van Buren had been released, the Jericho doc would have been the "ingame reality", whereas the contents of the New Canaan doc would basically have been cut content, which effectively balances the "time constraints" argument.

So in my opinion it depends on how severe the inconsistencies of the Jericho doc with the other docs are. If they are grave enough, I think it's safe to assume that the Jericho doc would have undergone major revisions before being put in the game, which would speak in favour of giving the New Canaan preference out of the two versions we have available. Since I can't really judge the inconsistencies between the Jericho doc and the others, I'll leave it up to you. -- Porter21 (talk) 19:46, January 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * As I said, I'll leave it up to you. I just don't think "only cut because of time constraints" is a very good argument, considering time constraints are one of the major reasons for cutting content in the first place (the others being "didn't work out as planned/didn't like it/no longer fits with rest of game); nearly every (finished) game has content cut because of that. The other arguments (Jericho unfinished etc) are more convincing.


 * Maybe we should simply let the two versions coexist in the respective articles by making seperate sections for the New Canaan and Jericho doc versions where they conflict? -- Porter21 (talk) 20:01, January 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Your last message sounds like a good idea, too (I wrote my previous message before reading that). -- Porter21 (talk) 20:02, January 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fine with me. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:33, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Items in the F2 Restoration mod
I went ahead and downloaded Killap's mod, but I'm not sure about what to do for filling in things on the EPA page, etc.

Do we consider the items (like Can of Dog Food) to be canon, since they were originally going to be included? Or do we do the same thing that we do to the rest of the user-created mods and ignore it? Nitty Tok. 03:38, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll hold off.
 * The Goris quick-derobe does make the game a little less canon, yeah. :P Nitty Tok. 03:45, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fallout Bible logo
Do you remember where you got the Fallout Bible logo from? Is it something official or fan-made? I'm asking because I need a bigger version of it - if there's no bigger version and it's fan-made I'll just make a new one. -- Porter21 (talk) 12:23, January 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fan-made, from Duck & Cover, right? -- Porter21 (talk) 13:52, January 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Meh, guess I'll have to find a way to make it bigger then. -- Porter21 (talk) 16:09, January 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Are the release dates on that mirror site correct? The one for Fallout Bible 1 seems off - probably a typo? I guess it should be 2002 instead of 2003? I'm asking because I want to put infoboxes on the Bible pages and the dates Avellone himself put in the documents are occasionally less than helpful (and some don't have a date on them at all). -- Porter21 (talk) 19:27, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

A Book Made Especially For You and Your Wikia
Its my honor to say that I want to publish a book on The Vault called Lost Planet. Astronauts are sent to explore Europa for extraterrestrial life, but time passes on Earth faster and they come back to discover that the world had ended in a nuclear fire. I started making this book around three months ago, but I havn't had much motivation to type more now. Its around 100 pages so far, but accidentaly deleted it on a Mac OS X and had to start over about 2000-3000 words back. I kinda want permission to be able to publish it on here as a fan fiction kinda thing. AND ITS JUST FOR YOU! :D

Fallout Bible
Sure, shouldn't be a problem. I think it'd be good to start "fresh" with these anyway, I've noticed quite a few of them have some text which wasn't in the original doc (aside from the comments in italics) - likely own additions people made before the docs were protected. I'll upload converted versions in a bit. -- Porter21 (talk) 11:45, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * All converted and located here: User:Porter21/Fallout Bible. FOB6 and FOB7 will require more patching up than the others since there are no .doc versions of them and I had to convert them twice (PDF -> DOC -> MediaWiki). -- Porter21 (talk) 14:46, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Maybe we should combine the two document projects into one ("Document conversion project")? The work required is pretty much the same. -- Porter21 (talk) 15:12, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * I've merged the two projects. -- Porter21 (talk) 17:45, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Fallout Warfare
No problem either. I suppose Mini-FOW Logo.png can be used? -- Porter21 (talk) 11:49, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Uploaded and added to Games. -- Porter21 (talk) 12:22, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Tactics
It's working on it (~400 pages left). I've also renamed the "Tactics 2" template accordingly. -- Porter21 (talk) 12:39, January 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Done. -- Porter21 (talk) 17:45, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Shrapnel - Combat behavior
I wanted to add that if he gets into combat that he may pick up weapons from his stock, as he may have a fat man and mini-nukes in his inventory when u first meet him, but i saw that was locked and didnt know if u were only reporting it on unique weapons

Fallout Extreme
Gameicon done and replaced in the template. -- Porter21 (talk) 10:22, January 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, one for FOX alone is maybe a bit... eXtreme? Sorry, couldn't resist the bad joke. Anyway, how about making one for all the canceled games (Portal:Canceled games)? -- Porter21 (talk) 23:09, January 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Of course VB would keep its separate portal ;) I just thought "canceled games" is simpler/catchier. I was thinking to only have a link to the VB portal from the canceled games one and otherwise keep it for the content of the other games - but if you'd rather name it "canceled spin-offs" that's fine with me as well. -- Porter21 (talk) 23:20, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Inventory for VB chars
Well, it's few and far in between. In my opinion, it makes more sense to add the section for the chars who need it than to remove it for all those who don't (who are the vast majority from what I've seen so far). -- Porter21 (talk) 12:40, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Images
They show the NPC in question quite well. Ain't broken - don't fix. http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/fallout/images/0/08/Personal_Sig_Image.gif Tagaziel (call!) 14:01, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * They are appropriate for the Outcasts, since they come from Lost Hills. http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/fallout/images/0/08/Personal_Sig_Image.gif Tagaziel (call!) 14:06, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Some policing please
Is it possible for you to tell MikealGrizzly to stop being such a douche and ruining forum threads? He's supposed to be an admin, but all he does is cause arguments, shitcan peoples suggestions simply because he doesn't believe in them and generally derail the entire thread. Other people have commented on it already through the various threads and it is too annoying. I'd expect that from a troll or something, but for that behaviour to come from an admin is unacceptable. Please tell him to tone his comments down and if he does feel the need to shit on peoples input, at least have the courtesy to actually contribute something to the thread in the same post. We get it, he doesn't like Fallout 3, why cant he let others discuss it without having to endure his dislike for the game or its developers.

Seriously, look how bad he has completely derailed the thread here: http://fallout.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:Bomb_crater_locations_from_the_great_war_only_found_3&t=20100127145805

Thank you. - Geroge Crushington

Magnetic Tape Drive
There was a link on the bottom of the page to Wikipedia's article on the tape driver. I assumed that it was more of the "list everything in the universe that's the same as ours" type, like Tarot and Birthday Party. Nitty Tok. 02:27, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Aye, sorry. Does Aspirin stay or not? Nitty Tok. 02:33, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Job
Wondering if you knew a good modder see im good at designing not so good at developingCloudstrife133 14:30, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Image revert
On Rococo Rockfowl, you reverted the metal-ish background to a white background, not a transparent background. Is that what you meant to do? Nitty Tok. 22:31, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * The white isn't exactly good either... but I guess it'll work until Porter gives it a transparent background. Nitty Tok. 01:49, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Wikia new article "improvement"
Don't know whether you noticed it yet, but Wikia is implementing an "improvement" to article creation next week. It seems to suffer from quite a lot of bugs (see Ciencia Al Poder's blog comment). Not sure whether we want to have that disabled - I can't see one "standard layout" to be superior to our current system. In fact, I'm not even sure what we would put in the one standard layout... Just to make you aware. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:38, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, that's what I thought first as well - but if you take a look at the test wiki, you'll see that clicking on any red link brings up the popup, too. -- Porter21 (talk) 23:57, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess the only thing we could do is set the standard layout to being empty; that way people will end up with an empty editbox no matter which option they select. Our layout box should still show up once you're past the popup thing - it doesn't seem like the new page request is redirected to Special:CreatePage fortunately. -- Porter21 (talk) 00:12, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess we can always hope :P Regarding JS, that's probably beyond my capabilities. -- Porter21 (talk) 00:24, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I guess it could. -- Porter21 (talk) 09:01, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw Toughpigs' reply on Central. Glad for it, too ;) -- Porter21 (talk) 21:17, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Fallout Credits
Ok, I could find it when I typed in "fallout credits" in the search box, so I just thought there wasn't page unlike with Fallout 3 credits. Shadowrunner56 03:05, February 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll get on that, and add what needs to be added. Shadowrunner56 03:10, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Vault Editting Help
Hey Ausir,

I just created a new article on the Wikia, and the results so far are not very pretty. Of course, this is only the first page I attemped to create alone, so I knew I would need help anyway. It's titled Store Merchants, fittingly about the Store merchants in Fallout 3. I would much appreciate an expericenced editor's feedback and guidance for this page.

Thanks, Ghouly89

Ghouly89 07:15, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Code for news blogs
Hi, I noticed your wiki runs news on the blog system. Thanks to #mediawiki - I've found some code that can hide the masthead on pages with a news category. We use this code at clubpenguin.

Essentially, just copy this code to Monaco.js (change as needed):

function addStyles { try { var cats = document.getElementById('catlinks').getElementsByTagName('a'); var inCat, catName; for (var i = 0; i < cats.length; i++) { catName = cats[i].title if (catName === 'Category:News') { inCat = true; } } if (inCat) importStylesheet('MediaWiki:Blog.css'); }catch (e) { /*might happen if no cats. ignore errors */} } addOnloadHook(addStyles);

Then add this to MediaWiki:Blog.css:

/** News pages **/ { display:none !important; } { border-top-width: 0px !important; }
 * 1) user_masthead, #contentSub
 * 1) page_bar

Cheers. --Zapwire (talk/User blog:zapwire|blog/edits) 11:38, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Developer images
A while ago, I split Category:Developer images into game-specific sub-categories. I've recently started to think that that was somewhat pointless as nobody's going to update the categorized images when new games are released (e.g. when FO4 comes out, I doubt someone will add "Category:Fallout 4 developer images" to the respective FO3 developer images). I'd simply move them all back into "Developer images" and get rid of the game subcats. Just wanted to check with you first - what do you think? -- Porter21 (talk) 21:46, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Vault Dweller Canon Gender?
Something I don't understand: The Vault Dweller article includes a note that says male gender was made canon by Fallout 2. I've read the memoirs, and my understanding was that the gender was left unspecified. Am I missing something?--Gothemasticator 20:13, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing that up for me.--Gothemasticator 20:23, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Darn devs, leaving canon in the hands of a changeable team!--Gothemasticator 20:47, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry...
Sorry, I respect that and thanks for listening, I appologize, I was a little angry.... Andromada101 21:24, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks and By The Way...
Should I create more articles on miscellaneous items (World objects) or would that be spam? Try to respond soon, thanks. CheezeWEEPツ 00:52, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

FNV logo
Which one should we use: File:Fallout NV logo.png or File:User Porter21 FNV logo temp.png? The first is cut from the trailer, the second from the picture Bethesda uses all over its websites. Can't make up my mind - the first is overall "smoother", the second is better lit. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:29, February 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's the one I went with in the end. It was better for the smaller logos like the one for Games, with the trailer one it just looked like a big black block.
 * On a related note, I think we should let Games insert the spoiler tag like we did for the FO3 DLCs - saves us the effort of removing them again later on. Unless you expect FNV not to be canon? -- Porter21 (talk) 01:49, February 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I think articles like NCR will be the minority, but if you want to keep the templates separate feel free to. Not sure whether I'm a fan of inserting the upcoming tag through the spoiler one though - it makes the upcoming box appear next to the infobox when it should really be above it for both aesthetic and standard layout reasons. Maybe we should simply make the spoiler tag include the upcoming category and replace it with the "upcoming" tag once FNV is out? It'll still have the same problems then, but at least I don't have to look at it for 8 months :P Nah, scratch that, let's just keep them separate. -- Porter21 (talk) 02:03, February 5, 2010 (UTC)


 * At second thought, I think you're right regarding not inserting the spoiler tags through the "games" template. We can simply remove it by bot later on. I had the effort required to get rid of the "FO3" tags in the back of my mind, but that was before I set up good old PorterBot :) -- Porter21 (talk) 02:10, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

My Talk Page
Is it okay if I erase things on my Talk Page. CheezeWEEPツ 17:22, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Really crazy advanced data on weapons
I read somewhere, maybe in Per's guide, about "weapon perks", like the .223 Pistol's Penetrate and the Improved Flamer's Flameboy, but I have no clue what they do, and I've never seen them mentioned anywhere else. Any idea where we could find those short of tearing right into the game itself? Nitty Tok. 18:17, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Ordering articles?
How does New Vegas fit in the current order of how article sections are arranged?


 * 1&2
 * 3
 * Tactics
 * BOS
 * VB
 * d20

Where does NV go? Nitty Tok. 03:52, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Ah. Order by release, then canon. Got it! Nitty Tok. 03:56, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Any idea what's wrong with Varmint's infobox? Nitty Tok. 04:46, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

templates
ok, I got it now. Shadowrunner56 04:55, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

PC Gamer scans
Hey man, I was wondering if it would be ok if I posted the PC gamer scans as a news article, so people could read them? Shadowrunner56 05:00, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Kay, I'll just post the cropped images I got from the scans and makes some pages for them that haven't already been made. Shadowrunner56 05:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Didn't we already talk about this?
About the whole redirecting pages thing?

Okay, I'll change it. But the list on Fallout: New Vegas weapons should say "Firearms", not Small Guns. Nitty Tok. 16:05, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * They haven't been confirmed anywhere, which is why it should be changed. They might not be small guns. But they are firearms in the general sense. And JE Sawyer mentioned Persuasion, right? Maybe it's been changed. Nitty Tok. 16:09, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Username question
Hi, Gothemasticator directed me to you with this question. I have a specific username in mind but when I try to register it it says it is invalid. Can you tell me what would give that message? Thanks! -128.103.10.191 17:12, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, either it's affected by some sort of block by Wikia (mostly happens if it includes profanity or if it's a username used by spambots) or the username has already been registered by someone else. Wikia has a shared user database across all its thousands of wikis, so the second is somewhat likely. What's the name you were trying to register? -- Porter21 (talk) 18:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I took out the space between the words, and it worked, so it's all good. Anyway, thanks for the response, Porter21.  I didn't realize that the username database is shared across wikia wikis.  Does that mean you can use the same login on multiple wikis? -HughJackman 19:39, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you can use your login for every wiki hosted by Wikia :) -- Porter21 (talk) 20:36, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Varmint infobox
Well, it doesn't like when it's given "parameter="-style info, i.e. if the parameter is present but there's nothing behind the equal sign. The basic problem with this kind of input it that the parameter does not count as being empty (even though there's nothing in it really), which is why it bypasses the usual checks which I've set up. That's not a problem usually, but the math functions used to calculate the values (when the template is used properly) then complain about the input not being a number; the result is what you're seeing.

I'm gonna have to think about it. -- Porter21 (talk) 18:41, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, seems like there's one specific check for the number of projectiles which is causing the error if "projectiles" is not given. Working on it. -- Porter21 (talk) 19:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Should be fixed, hopefully I haven't broken anything else. I desperately need to tidy up Infobox weapon gamebryo some day. -- Porter21 (talk) 19:14, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Ausir, I need some help in the first Fallout. Please go to the Cathedral's talk page of you've got any time. 24.168.4.99 01:16, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Duke Nukem/They Live Quote
Hmm, interesting. Then shouldn't we add it in there, except under They Live instead of Duke Nukem?

Vegas leather jacket?
You got a source for that? Nitty Tok. 04:32, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Ah. Okay. Nitty Tok. 04:35, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

General area name
Hey Ausir.

I'm taking a look at how many times the Capital Wasteland link is thrown around, and I'm wondering if we have a name for the worldspace in New Vegas. New Vegas is just the city, and we're currently using "the area around New Vegas". Could we use Mojave Desert as the general area name? Nitty Tok. 02:30, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

sorry, I'll stop removing it. Shadowrunner56 04:12, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

New look
It's Ausir, baby! Ausir!--Gothemasticator 21:16, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm with him, excellent choice. Now, just take a few showers to wash out the formaldehyde. :) Nitty Tok. 21:40, February 9, 2010 (UTC)