Talk:Leg. healing powder

Legion vs. Legate

 * It would seem that there are duplicate pages here. There's Legion healing powder and Legate healing powder. I made the latter a while ago, and I feel it has better information on it. So the real question is: are we calling the powder 'Legion' or 'Legate'? Kastera (talk) 18:32, July 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * We are calling it Legion healing powder.MysteryStranger 20:42, July 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I redirected legate to legion for now. However I would cast my vote for Legate healing powder, since only Lanius uses it. Anyone agree?.
 * Xa3  talk  Contributions  MysteriousStranger.png:50, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it could have been, but players can be confused. So it would be logical to enter the name of the product equal to the name of the page. MysteryStranger 20:56, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see how players would get confused.
 * Xa3  talk  Contributions  MysteriousStranger.png:57, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've returned the page to what it was before redirecting. It was a bit too hasty to redirect it before discussing it. Now, I really think that the Legate healing powder should stay because it has much more concrete information on it. For one, the world model is correct; it's not a pouch of healing powder, it's Buffout. Then, the "Characteristics" are filled out better. Overall, the Legate page surveys more information than that of the Legion. Kastera (talk) 03:57, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Not only that, it's only used on the Legate in particular and it's intended to never be collected by the player. I'm pretty sure it's Legate, but keeping it as Leg. might be the best choice. :o Nitty Tok. 04:18, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would go with Legate for the simple facts already posted above, plus the addition of the GECK editor id being NVHealingPowderLegate. That coupled with the facts that there is no evidence to support Legion. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 20:21, July 11, 2011 (UTC)