Forum:Fallout wars ( split in the nerd lands )

ok i have been on this website and i have notesed sothing, fallout fans seem to be split in lots of subjects like if FO3 sucks(i like FO3) or wich factchan is the best. even with FONV the game thats not even out yet. like fighting over hard core mode. and hell there has been fighting ver wat part of fallout is the best part, some may say its the mood, or the conbat,or the area, or some shit like that. so what do you think, what do youwant to fight about.MrDot01 19:31, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You are right. There is quite a split. I don't like fighting about any of it, but I'll tell you where I fall among the battle lines...
 * I prefer FO and FO2. I've spent many more hours playing those two games than I ever will spend playing FO3. I don't actually get very hot and bothered about the lore aspects. But I really enjoy the character creation system of the original games, as well as the turn-based combat. I tend to prefer thinking over action in games. I also enjoyed the quest design a lot more in the original games. FO3 is basically a railroad main quest that cuts a narrow path through an open world that is built for exploration. What I liked about the first couple games is that there were many quests, and the differences between the main quest and the side quests wasn't always that great. Exploration is fun, but it is actiony fun. I guess I'm just not that much of a next-gen guy.--Gothemasticator 20:31, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

I haven't played the first two, but the character and world development seems like its better in those. Unlike Goth, though, I prefer the FPS gameplay of F3 over the turn based combat of the originals. New Vegas should meld those nicely. Knight Captain Ski (talk) 21:59, May 3, 2010 (UTC)

ya i played 1 and 2 and i fill when it comes to story and mood seting. but i like the fps part of 3 it made it much more immersive MrDot01 19:42, May 4, 2010 (UTC)