Talk:Vault-Tec Exhibit Vault

Museum of Tech
Should this not be incorporated into the mot article in a location rework project?--Kingclyde 23:37, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

I think so, at least. A general Museum of Tech article with all the sub-areas would probably be best, since they aren't even their own cells. Dhakkel 00:00, September 29, 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree, I think the guy who made this is going to do clean-up, but it should be listed in sections--Kingclyde 00:25, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

I am planing clean-up, but if you have any more information please add some. However, this can sill needs its own article, it is similar to the Demonstration vault, which has its own article. Vault 815 01:50, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually it is a disambiguation which refers you back to the museum of tech page. If you follow the layout for the project, all of the section s will be covered including this one. If we had separate pages for the rocket display, the planetarium and the wright plane section, that would be silly. They all need to be listed under mot. There simply isn't enough relevent information to make a separate article and not have a stub.--Kingclyde 02:12, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * coughcoughLA Vault isn't part of the Cathedral pagecough. Nitty 02:16, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you ok? Do you need a halls?--Kingclyde 02:46, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * wheeze... I'll be fine... coughcoughget those things away from me, they're probably laced with LSDcough... Nitty 02:49, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * No just PCP--Kingclyde 02:53, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * The LA Vault appears in a different game - for FO3 we have the rule that all cells which make up a location should be described in that location's article. The only exception is Underworld (since it's a settlement inside a larger location, special case) and buildings inside towns. Long story short, this should be merged with the Museum of Technology article. -- Porter21 (talk) 08:22, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * My thoughts exactly!--Kingclyde 08:29, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * And on the whole Cathedral/LA Vault thing, if that was remade in FO3 you just know the Vault would be its own Cell. I'm not expecting Vault 112 to be part of the Smith & Casey Garage article! Dhakkel 10:28, September 29, 2009 (UTC)
 * Vault 112 is a fully functional quest related vault. This one is not. Simple.--Kingclyde 17:12, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

The demonstration Vault was not fully fuctional, and it had its own page.
 * Here are the guidelines to the location project. This needs to be included in the MoT article. All of the locations need to follow this guideline and be reworked in this manner. This Vault is a section of the MoT and not a separate building/location. There isn't a different load screen when I enter the Vault nor is it impoortant in the manner of having unique loot or a special purpose in-game. Please sign your posts.--Kingclyde 08:54, September 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * Not to mention that the LA Vault was fully functional, as it was the origin of the Adytum and other gangs. http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/fallout/images/thumb/4/4a/Naglowaa_se.gif/11px-Naglowaa_se.gif Tagaziel (call!) 10:01, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for not signging my post. My defintion of a vualt is a not nesasarly seprit structure (also the case of vault 112)with a HUGE metal door, with Vault-Tec Technology. Vault 815 02:04, October 1, 2009 (UTC)


 * Here are the guidelines which we are following which I forgot to add in my last post [The_Vault:Fallout_3_locations_project]. I understand that different people have different definitions of many things, but here a vault gets it's own page if it is or was a fully functional vault that was used for the social experiments and not a s a display. Let me put it another way. The MoT is a museum of technology. That would make the vault there another display piece in all reality. We simply cannot give the P-51, the space lander, the mini vertibird etc separate articles. I would believe the consensus here is for this to be included in the MoT article as per the rework project. Thanks for your work here. If you wish to move this information to the MoT page and do the rework on that page, you are more than welcome to.--Kingclyde 05:13, October 1, 2009 (UTC)