User talk:Mattan138

Sugar Bombs
It could be, or it couldn't - it's not really sure. Since there were multiple possible references listed which were all equally likely (or unlikely), I opted to remove all of them except for the reference to the general term. If there are multiple equally likely possibilities, which one is the correct one becomes speculation - and speculation is something which should be avoided. You can always start a discussion on the article talk page - if others agree with you, you are always free to add it back. -- Porter21 (talk) 19:42, November 10, 2009 (UTC)


 * I got'cha. Thanks for explaining the situation. --Mattan138 00:08, November 11, 2009 (UTC)