Forum:Ok its no fallout 3 but ok

ok 1st off i think Beth could have done better. ok i love fallout new vegas but it has some big problems that may set it lower then fallout 3 for me. the land seems a lot smaller (i know its not but it just feels smaller), and i do think thay have 200 marked area because thay marked randome crap, woooo you found shack. the writing and acting is subpar, some acters sound so bland and have no feeling. the writing ok (i like the story ark and all) but it just seems bland, and it really lost its in the Epicness contest, say what you like but in fallout 3 there was some bad ass fights that made you feel grate after wining. last thing hard core was a fail for me. --MrDot01 19:18, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, as soon as I saw you write that F3 had better voice acting, I stopped reading. Do a direct comparison of NV and 3's voice-acting, don't rely on year-old memories. 19:22, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

While you're right that New Vegas did inflate its marked location count with extraneous areas, so did Fallout 3 (Rockbreaker's Last Gas?). You're crazy on every other account. Fallout 3 never once put me in a fight I wasn't certain I could win. New Vegas, on the other hand, made Super Mutants actually put up a fight. I had to stay away from Black Mountain for a while because I didn't have a weapon that could really hurt a super mutant and had no companions. Deathclaws were always rough, but now they're practically indestructible unless you Sneak Attack Crit them. Also, try picking a fight with the Van Graff family in their store. Good luck. Also, how was Hardcore "a fail," exactly? Schneidend 19:29, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

The robot's voices are worse (just what I think) and it does feel smaller, but other than that I dissagree, FNV is great (although I hate Nightkin. So. Damn. Strong.) 19:33, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

I prefer the new Mr. Gutsy and Mr. Handy voices, but yeah, the Protectrons sound odd. I love Primm Slim's voice, though. Schneidend 19:37, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

hard core was just not fun for me, and u seem to miss under stand what i said yuri. i said that in NV the acters give ther lines with such blandness, i did a direct comparison thenk you very much and fallout 3 acters really did good on there lines (all the 3 acters lol) but thats not to say NV had its moments its just there were so many time i talked to some one and it had no feeling at all. why would you say im crazy for haveing a opinion? fallout NV fell short on making it a epic advencher, Fallout 3 regard less of it being easyer was way more epic. im talking about not knowing if your going to win im talking about just feeling grate about wining because the fight was fun to be in. Yuri its a little silly to not read something just because you read something you dont see eye to eye on, its always smart to read everything lol :P. but sorry if my opiniom dos not sit well with anyone ells :P --MrDot01 19:38, October 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * For me, hardcore is amongst the best parts of FONV. The first long trek I took across the Mojave I ended up having to drink out of the toilet because I couldn't find a basin that worked. Plus, I think the moral ambiguity is much more pronounced in this one, and you are more likely to come across a fight you just can't win. I like feeling like a regular person too. Sort of ruined it when people started talking about me on the radio, but in the early game you are a small fish in a very big pond. Other highlights - some cave mouths that actually look like caves, not doors in the rockface; towns that would actually work (crops,manufacturing, etc); crafting is much improved; weapon mods; different ammo types; jeez the list just goes on. --Johnny Trash (Talk) 03:58, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

FONV isn't as clever as FO3. Moira Brown and the Wasteland Survival Guide in Fallout 3 were funny. It was a great bridge piece for the middle of the game. I don't see anything nearly that interesting in FONV. It might by that FONV has more replay value than FO3. Ratwod 12:44, October 27, 2010 (UTC)