User talk:24.113.234.96

Read the note, speculation DOES NOT BELONG IN ARTICLES. One more revert and you will be banned.--Kingclyde 00:57, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

How so...?

Speculation goes on the discussion page. You should have read that both times in the note field as to why I removed it. Then adding "STOP DELETING" in the article is something else that doesn't go in articles. This is not a forum it is a wiki and need to maintain a professional appearance. Thanks.--Kingclyde 01:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

The note was completely relevant though. I still don't understand.

Speculation means that it has no factual backing. That comment has no factual backing. How do you know it's metal armor? Did you loot it from them? No. There is no factual information so it is considered speculation and thus does not belong in articles. Also please sign your posts. Thanks!--Kingclyde 01:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you delete every other comment then...? I don't see any "factual backing" on any of them...

Really? Don't try to change the fact that YOUR comment is the issue here. The issue is your "fact" is not backed by anything. If you cannot comprehend that and wish to resume arguing a mute point, than that is your choice. But the decision is made and your comment will stay out of the article. Thanks and have a great day.--Kingclyde 01:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Look at the worn out armor the Feral Ghoul Reaver is wearing. Then compare it to the Metal Armor. Every remaining piece of the Feral Ghoul Reaver's armor is clearly identical to those of the Metal Armor...

By definition, the word reaver makes it even more evident that Feral Ghoul Reavers may be ghoulified Raiders or Slavers...