Forum:I think this image should be deleted

File:Optical_illusion.jpg <-- This image should be deleted, since this isn't a porn Wiki. There are plenty of other sites for that. 71.106.238.2 20:16, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * By my definition, that isn't pornography. --233345-cartman1_tiny.gif Avatar talk.png 00:02, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it shows anus. Kids go here. 71.106.238.2 09:18, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you even know what an anus is? And kids shouldn't even be playing Fallout, this is a wiki for a mature game and we aren't catering for children here as far as I'm concerned. --233345-cartman1_tiny.gif Avatar talk.png 20:14, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

Are you so sexually repressed that you can't handle an image of a woman in a bikini. As long as there are no naughty bits showing and its only added to a userpage I don't see any problem with it. --RAM 11:43, August 21, 2011 (UTC)

Technically, it is porn, as porn is anything that can be sexually arousing. However, if you're into certain stuff (and hell, you may be. I ain't judgin' here), a lot of stuff on the wiki as it is could be porn *cough* Gomorrah *cough*. However, it's not "straight up porn", so I don't really see a problem with it.--With care and happiness,  Supermutantslayer450'  You will know the truth... And the truth will set you free..  09:27, August 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually to correct you, "Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal". Now this image primary purpose is humour and nor sexual arousal. And considering you can dress like this in public across most of the world, it can hardly be considered sexually explicit either. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 15:15, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

I agree that it should be removed. It doesn't have any place here, its too far off topic to belong. If you want to post pics like that, may I suggest FaceBook? Agent c 00:17, August 23, 2011 (UTC)

Many images here on the Fallout Wiki have no place here. --TheConvictsSUCK 00:23, August 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * How can you go off topic on a user page exactly? And it is funny you mention Facebook, considering Wikia have just introduced a new flashy user profile design, in an attempt to be more like a social networking site. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 00:50, August 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Voting with GhostAvatar on this: he's completely correct. It's not porn, it's intent is humor and it's legal to wear that out in public. I'm also agreeing with regards to saying that you can't go "off-topic" on a User Page and it's certainly not vandalizing The Vault.  -- The Arcadian Rook(talk)User blog: Arcadian Rook 22:21, August 23, 2011 (UTC)

I agree that its not offensive, and you are encroaching upon his rights. JimmyDreznaut017 22:57, August 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * I thought this pic was balancing on the line there. The humor bit went by me for the most part anyway... I have let it slip through the mazes this time, categorizing it. JspoelJspoel Vault Boy.png 23:05, August 23, 2011 (UTC)

I'd have to agree that this image needs to go. This site is for Fallout, and anything related to Fallout, and that image has nothing to do with Fallout. It needs to go.--Ryker6102:04, August 24, 2011 (UTC)~7:00pm 8/23/2011


 * Right, so why don't you remove your avatar image and replace it with something Fallout related. Because this is essentially what you are telling others to do with there user space. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 03:06, August 24, 2011 (UTC)

I'm talking about non-Fallout images in the image gallery. My avatar image isn't in the image gallery. And I was never even talking about avatar images to begin with!!!!--Ryker6109:07, August 24, 2011 (UTC)~2:01am 8/24/2011


 * You never stated image gallery, you stated this site. Additionally, user pages (including avatars) comes under this site. As for the image gallery, what image gallery you talking about. Maybe Category:User page images, of which many images are not fallout related, for the simple fact that they dont appear on the fallout section of this site. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 15:02, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ryker61 may be referring to the small gallery in the "Images on this wiki" module within the Wikia/Oasis sidebar. It is a bit embarrassing to see questionably offensive, non-Fallout related images in that module, because the module is meant to be a preview of content on this site. ~ Gardimuer { ʈalk } 21:21, August 24, 2011 (UTC)

GhostAvatar, You're right. I didn't say image gallery in my first post. I should have clarified that originally. The image gallery should only be for Fallout related images. User page images should have their own gallery and should not be in the image gallery. That's exactly what I was talking about Gardimuer. --Ryker6121:38, August 24, 2011 (UTC)~2:22pm 8/24/2011


 * That gadget simple purpose is to show recently uploaded images. There is no way to separate out any kind of images within that gadget. This is why we separate them in catergorys instead. Of which, user images has there own space as linked above. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 23:45, August 24, 2011 (UTC)

Okay that's fine. Point is, the image 71.106.238.2 is talking about, and others like it, are inappropriate, irregardless of whom this website caters to.--Ryker6105:29, August 25, 2011 (UTC)~10:25pm 8/24/2011


 * The thing is, they are only inappropriate by your standards. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 14:25, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Kind of wondering now how far we can go on our user pages, is it ok if I put a pic of my boobs on there? I am kind of concerned, between this and the other forum discussion about political symbols, there seems to be content policy related to the wiki per se, but not to user pages that I can find. At any rate, wiki image policy does state that "The file names of user page images have to start with "User" in order to avoid confusion with images for use in articles," so at least in that regard this pic needs to be renamed. -LawdyMissMaudy 21:27, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Let me put it this way, as I did above. Would it be illegal for you to expose yourself in such a manner in public. User avatar tag.gif Avatar talk.png 21:40, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Depends on where, and how. For example, in Burlington, VT, it's perfectly legal to walk down the street naked. However, stripping in public is against the law in that same city. Also, most European countries have no problems with the naked female breast. Anyway, all I am suggesting is that perhaps there *should* be a User page content policy, because currently there is none. (btw I also have no problem with the image under discussion, I happen to find it amusing as well).-LawdyMissMaudy 22:32, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think the Vault needs to make a content policy that would just overlap Wikia's own policies. Wikia already has a policy against "hate", "libel", and "pornographic content". The only addendum you could make to that is a precise definition of what each of those terms means. I think that would be pointless and unnecessary. ~ Gardimuer { ʈalk } 01:52, August 26, 2011 (UTC)