Forum:Screen shot mess up, or what

go here to see http://gamerant.com/wp-content/uploads/new-vegas-scan2.jpg or here http://arewenewatthis.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/fall-1.jpg Hay look at this the super mutants are different then the super mutants that are on the west side, thay look like the ones from vault 87 in Fallout 3. could this mean that there will be Vault 87 super mutants in Fallout new vegas, or was this just a fuck up you tell me MrDot01 22:45, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

I don't see a differentsDeath To All Ghouls 00:14, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

well the super mutants in fo3 were made in vault 87 and thay were yellow, but the super mutants that are supos to be in fonv are gray becouse thay are the real super mutants, i sould have added a pick of the super mutants thats are gray well heres a linkMrDot01 03:52, May 23, 2010 (UTC) http://img297.imageshack.us/i/nv8.jpg/


 * Time to quell some stupidity. The grey-skin mutants are Nightkin, plain and simple. The facial animations were placeholders left over from the F3 engine. They have been changed. You can see a basic FEV-II mutant in this screenshot. Nitty Tok. 04:03, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * well you dont have to be such a dick about ansering a ? man (not ment to be a insolt, i dont want to hert some ones feelings and get blocked agen) well i just thout it was funny or if it was a sigh that there will be FO3 mutants. gosh no need to say some one is stuped when thay dont know something, and i did say that the mutant was changed i just thoght it was weard that there was vault 87 mutants in that one pic MrDot01 05:55, May 23, 2010 (UTC). next time answer it a little nicer if you dont mind :P
 * if you don't want to 'insolt' people then you probably shouldn't call them dicks. Ishotamaninnewreno 09:08, May 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Even so, Nitty makes a good point to at least explain. Other fans are not so forgiving. Another connection is to just play FO1 or 2 and take a look at mutants like Leu or Marcus, then compare. Doesn't hurt to revisit the classics a bit. :-) JessKa89 01:39, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * The future is always contextually sited in the past, thats how you create a consistent vision. Sure, revisiting and refining the past has its place, but ignoring what has gone on before is a bad move. So huzzah for Obsidian! Ishotamaninnewreno 03:54, May 28, 2010 (UTC)