User talk:Amonkeyonfire

Hi there!
Welcome to our Fallout wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what other people are editing right this minute, and where you can help.


 * If you haven't already, create a user page about yourself! If you do, we'll be able to know you better as a member of our community.


 * Questions? You can ask in the Forum or on the "discussion" page associated with each article, join the live chat in our IRC channel or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? The Help page has an outline of the site, and pages to help you learn how to edit. See the Vault's Policy page for general guidelines and code of conduct.


 * I'm really happy to have you here, and look forward to working with you!


 * -- Porter21 (talk) 20:36, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Stanley's Party Hat
Stanley's Party Hat doesn't have its own page since it's really not all that different from the regular one. It can be found at Party Hat. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:36, September 24, 2009 (UTC)


 * As you can see above, I already sent you an explanation. Watch your language please, insulting other editors is going to get you blocked pretty quickly. -- Porter21 (talk) 20:51, September 24, 2009 (UTC)


 * You have been blocked for intimidating behavior. Block time frame is one week. If you continue the behavior, the block will be extended. Thanks and have a great day!--Kingclyde 20:55, September 24, 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I wouldn't have blocked right away - he (or she) is new after all.


 * To reply to the other stuff Amonkeyonfire mentioned on my talk page - the BirthSkirt exists ingame (as does Stanley's Party Hat), it just cannot be obtained without using the console (the character's mother wears it during the opening sequence). Hence the article does not need to be deleted. It has an own page because there is no similar clothing it could be merged with (unlike Stanley's Hat). -- Porter21 (talk) 21:14, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

sorry porter i was just a bit annoyed at the time. anyway i must have an account on every website on the inernet so im no socialite myself. oh and kingclyde takeing it apon your self to ban people even through more (and lucky for me) tollorant and mature people have allready brushed it off...is kinda umm qestionable for someone of your status

not to lecture you or tell you how to do your job or anything...


 * As for your comment towards me, I appreciate constructive criticism. Thanks. But I have dealt with too many people that come here and start calling people names and whatnot. You were blocked for intimidating behavior towards Porter. In my travels home from work I pondered on lifting your ban to give you another chance. But when I come here, you have attacked me as well. I will reduce your ban to 1 day, but please work on your grammar and the way you treat other people. Thanks and have a great day.--Kingclyde 22:49, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

all good (i guess) but one qestion...whats with the "have a nice day" thing? seems kinda umm...*ponder ponder* ironic and out of place? maybe even alittle sarcastic? in other words some people may find it alittle cheeky and umm (ionically) intimidating when thay see the words "and have a nice day" at the end of a ban notification.

however i for one thinking back on it now find it quit laugherable. but i didnt at the time...

maybe something along the lines "please read and follow the rules accordingly in the future" would be less agravating.

yet again not to lecture you or tell you anything or to "attack" you anyway. just see it as harmless constructive criticism.

if however you feel "attacked" and "agravated" by any of this feel free to tell me about it. presumably in the form of another ban notification ending ironicly in the words "have a nice day" so i may have another jolly laugh.

have a nice day

-The Fire Monkey

Stop that.
Don't make red links in the categories.

It makes cougar unhappy. Nitty 16:26, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

why what damage dose it do? i thought it would only show up on my user page...
 * Categories are only for actual content, not for user pages. If you add an existing category to your user page, it falsely shows up in the category's page listing; if you add a category which doesn't exist, the category falsely shows up as a wanted category. -- Porter21 (talk) 09:59, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

ahh sorry about that i didnt know-The Fire Monkey 11:16, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- Porter21 (talk) 10:18, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

WHOA! HAY! >:( you fucked up my info box! please dont edit my page please....-The Fire Monkey 11:16, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * The template you used (datarow DR) was deleted since it shouldn't be used anymore - I only edited your user page to remove the red link. Also, please remember to sign entries on talk and forum pages by typing four tildes . -- Porter21 (talk) 09:59, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

where do i put the tildes? at the end or the start or both?-The Fire Monkey 11:16, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * At the end - it produces something similar to what is at the end of my entries. -- Porter21 (talk) 10:18, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

man i gotta go change my info box....i hate chnageing info box's...there so messy and fiddley im only good for correcting spelling mistakes when i see them...-The Fire Monkey 11:16, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

unmarked locations catagory?
some of the most weird and fun things in the wasteland are some of the most secret! from the ghoul outpost just south of grayditch which houses the only traped supermutant in the capital wasteland! to the king of radroachs! so why not make a catagory with all these locations in? huh?-The Fire Monkey 21:23, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

...i cant be bothered so you do it!
 * There is one already. Category:Fallout 3 unmarked locations. Ausir(talk) 21:06, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

oh thanks man! hay shouldnt it be a part of the places article?-The Fire Monkey 21:23, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

which difficulty is best for my friendly's?
ok i been playing fallout 3 on very easy cos i wanted to do the perfect play through like: killing all evil character's like jericho and moriarty and even the patient in rivet city in Dr preston's office and haveing all friendlys survive like not loseing a brotherhood member at the GNR battle and so on...

but it turn's out that difficulty settings allso affect allies too so brotherhood soilders seem to get there ass's handed to them unless i come too the save and caravaners are...well...by the time i got too cantaberry commons thay had all been fucked sideways...

but on normal difficulty brotherhood soilders seem to be able to fight off a few muties before going down and caravaners seem to last pritty long too

qestion: so if i play on very hard will brotherhood soilders kick ass and caravaners last a hole play through?-The Fire Monkey 09:28, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

{update} ok i gave it a try and it seems that thay all do pritty well on very hard...but i need to play alittle more first... {end update}