Forum:Survivalist better than Honest Hearts

Is it me or was the Survivalists (Randall Clark) side story more interesting than the actual HH storyline. I found it much more engaging finding all the computer terminals and reading the logs, not to mention the amount of cool gear u find throughout Clarks caves.

I did rather enjoy it. Completing honest hearts was sort of a chore to me, or an obligation to do it simply because I bought it. It was great and all but it never made me want to explore every little bit of the map. Possibly because when I dismissed follows-chalk, i could never get him back. So there was really no reason to find all those high-points in the map. However, the survivalists story made me enter every cave i saw in curiosity to see what was going on. However, I was disappointed when I read the log about him burying the 2 people 'south' from where ever it was. I never found the graves. Are they actually there or no?--24.36.136.171 18:42, September 19, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with you; the Survivalist's story was more interesting, and it was very enjoyable and moving. Also, you end up with cool stuff and nice handy safe-houses from which to operate. The only thing that really interested me about the story-line of Honest Hearts was Joshua Graham; he is definitely one of my top five favorite characters from Fallout so far and completely stole the spotlight from Daniel and the other people - I chose his preferred outcome because the endings were more interesting as a result. That and he has bad-ass armour. :) Q-35 19:13, September 19, 2011 (UTC)

Same, Joshua Graham is awesome " i dont enjoy killing, but when done rituously, its just a chore like any other " defo one of my fav characters. LUCIAN-44 00:36, September 20, 2011 (UTC)