Forum:Adminship Request IV - Tezzla Cannon

This is my request for adminship. It has been six months since my last request.

Background
I have been on this site for a year now and have been active almost every day. I stop vandalism a lot and have had rollback for 10 months. I know what to revert and stuff and I would be good with admin powers. I can also help with the file deletion project. I would also be a very useful admin, and I have improved on stuff that negative votes said in the other requests. For more information please see my others: Forum:Adminship Request - Tezzla Cannon, Forum:Adminship Request II - Tezzla Cannon, and Forum:Adminship Request III - Tezzla Cannon.

Changes since last requests
I have made my warnings to vandals better and my blogs are more better.

More
12000 + edits and (i think) 1000 + articles created.

Poll
Thankyou for taking the time to vote.

Votes
I still don't think you are mature enough to be an administrator. It might just be a matter of you growing older before you prove to me that you can handle the added privileges and user rights. (Plus, you still have a few grammatical errors in this request.) -- Ghouly89 (Talk) 02:12, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Yes Tezzla's been here for ages, spending his time entirely devoted to the vault, getting news and information others can't, and fixing much needed areas. I say he deserves to be an admin, hell, I'd like to see him become a bureaucrat but I suppose that is out of the question. Sombar1 12:00, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

No You've been here for quite a while, and your edits are just as good as anybody else's. However, I believe that this is ultimately undermined by the instances of childishness and poor judgement that I've seen on your part. You're a good contributor, I just want to see more marked improvement before you become an Admin. Hal10k(Leonard Bernstein!) 23:09, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

No - I think there's a point at which we draw the line and say "Eh, there are some people who will just never make adminship...". This is that point, Tezzla. Although, this is mostly because I'm pissed at the "fruity" comment. What do I know, after all? Nitty Tok. 04:30, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Although I think you're a good editor, and you do know what you're doing, I don't feel that you are fully ready for adminship (I could be wrong), but as for now, sorry buddy, I'm on the fence for this one. 12:34, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

No You've made a lot of good edits, but you're still too young in my book to become an administrator of such a big wiki, with the responsibility that comes with it. Sorry. Jspoelstra 14:19, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Yes I think you can do it, you've spent a while here fixing things so in my opinion you deserve it.Zoso1219 09:07, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Yes Tezzla makes hundreds of edits each day and he knows what he's doing. He brings us news every week and keeps the vandilism down. Also he is good at organising a lot of things and making new pages, adding as much detail as he can. You can tell that he really cares for the Vault and would make a great admin in my opinion. Plus this wiki needs more admins. CHIEF Talk to me 17:58, February 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Votes below were added past expiry date of poll -- Porter21 (talk) 14:48, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

You have both advantages and disadvantages. So I'll put the decision in the hands of those who have more to say. veryblackraven Talk 13:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Yes I've seen Tezzla as an active user more than a year ago, and he keeps up the good work. I think he can bypass his young age because, I'm sure, he's mature enough to realize he's a goddamn admin of the greatest wiki. Yes, yes, yes. --YakovFrolov 13:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Discussion
Before I vote, I would appreciate it if you clean up the grammar in this request. I believe one should prove they are ready for adminship (at the very least) by proving they know to capitalize their Is. Thank you ;)

Also, I think you should post new reasons for each new request instead of linking to previous ones with which you were not able to attain adminship. If your arguement as to why you deserve it now is why you didn't in the past, then that isn't a very good way to approach this. And last, please use the template correctly. It's all in the presentation! -- Ghouly89 (Talk) 20:52, February 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * I feel sorry for Tezzla. Man, 3 rejections, and, looking at Porter21's comment, it's going to make a 4. Come on. You can't be so cruel, people! --YakovFrolov 13:42, February 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, the poll expired yesterday, otherwise I wouldn't have posted a "result" ;) Even if we'd add today's (belated) votes, it'd still be 4-3-3, which is too diffuse for me being able to comfortably grant sysop privileges. -- Porter21 (talk) 14:48, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Result
Sorry, not enough support I'm afraid (3 yes, 3 no, 2 abstain). -- Porter21 (talk) 23:15, February 13, 2011 (UTC)