Forum:The Family - good or evil?

Yarr, be the bloodsuckers good or evil?

I'm not certain as to whether I should consider these folks evil or not. Sure, after the Lone Wanderer arranges for Arefu to feed them blood so they don't have to murder anymore they don't murder for blood anymore, but before that they certainly did. They refuse to admit that eating corpses and murdering people to drink their blood is evil, but then again, Vance does keep them from murdering people to eat their flesh and eventually, with the L.W.'s assistance, stops their murdering ways altogether. Thoughts, anyone? I ask, of course, because I am not sure which route is appropriate for altruist characters or hideously evil characters (what if I actually decrease the rates of cannibalism? For shame!) User_talk:68.151.188.146

They dont kill for pleasur they kill only too feed!Sgt.Salvator:NCR Rangers 20:35, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would say that they are neither good nor evil. They don't murder people to drink their blood, they just take it from them in the night. What they are doing is wrong, but they could be doing much worse. Convincing Vance to trade with the people of Arefu would be the good approach, while doing nothing would be the neutral/evil approach (Vance will continue his ways unabated). --MadDawg2552 17:01, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * They're just trying to follow their own path's, so I would consider them neutral. I have my own philosophy with there being no good and evil. Nukey - (Speak to me!!!)