Forum:Urbanized

Has anyone considered that Bethesda might just want to throw everyone for a loop and NOT make New Vegas mostly wasteland? It would certainly be a change for Fallout. But just think about it... It's title... NEW Vegas. We might not be crawling around the ruins of old Las Vegas as much as running through the streets of a newly-risen metropolis. Las Vegas would not be as high-priority a target for Chinese bombing as L.A. or D.C., so could well have been spared all but minor destruction. Hoover Dam should have existed in the Fallout timeline (operational 1936), so unless it was dismantled in the 21st-century rush to atom-power everything, could still be partly functional and providing power. Yes, it could be surrounded by desert, radioactive dumps, and collapsed military bases, but the city itself might be HUGE and a significant part of the adventuring area. Las Vegas achieved its current state in barely 60 years. Think it couldn't do more in 200? 76.94.225.90

I'd like it if Vegas was the only town, but it was so big that there are parts that are towns and parts that are dangerous. Also, there could be desert all around, but it would be filled with monsters and stuff like that, but tech and chems and stuff in old ruins all around. --Toast 20:52, November 9, 2009 (UTC)