Forum:Could the Nuclear weapons article get some attention?

The Nuclear weapons article has many issues with non-sourced information, conjecture, original research, Fallout 3 negative bias and plain incorrect facts, most of which are listed on the article's talk page. Yet the article still contains those issues, some years old, and many attempts at discussion are met with open hostility by a listed administrator.

I am aware of the general editing recommendation of "be bold" being widespread on wikis, including this one, but from my point of view, considering the facts and sources, the only recourse is excising a large portion of the article as a rewrite is seemingly impossible due to a lack of canonical sources. But going ahead and deleting that amount of text without a discussion seems questionable regardless of inaccuracy and would likely lead to an edit war.

And there's also the fact that I consider the topic of Nuclear weapons to be of such an integral part of the Fallout world that the article covering them should be held to a higher standard. Dr. Lobotomy 17:01, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd be happy to take it under my wing. It'll be done by tonight. Also, try not to edit it, because if I spend a few hours sorting it, then get a edit conflict, I'll just use my edit, and tell people to do it again. Thanks for giving me something to do :). TheGuardianCalligraphy.pngGuardianoftheWastesTag.png